The Outlook for the U.S. Agricultural Economy
Introduction
Let me begin by thanking the Chairman for the opportunity to appear before the Committee to provide information concerning the outlook for U.S. agriculture. The Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI) is a joint project between the University of Missouri and Iowa State University. Furthermore, we have formal relationships with Texas A&M University to examine market and policy changes at the farm level, with the University of Arkansas to analyze the world rice market, and with Arizona State University to examine the fruit and vegetable sector. My testimony represents the work of several analysts at these institutions and is designed to provide an update to the FAPRI outlook presented to Committee staff in March of this year.
As 1998 has progressed, attention has increasingly been focussed on the downward pressure on prices for a number of the major commodities. This, of course, is occurring at the same time that some regions of the country are experiencing severe drought conditions, with the combination of the two putting even greater pressure on some producers. In regards to the lower prices, no single cause can be identified, but rather a combination of fundamental developments in the supply and demand of the commodities.
Response of Global Supplies
World grain and oilseed markets are being pressured by increased production that has allowed stocks to rebuild from the tight levels of 1995 and 1996. The higher production is due both to increased area and generally favorable yields. In response to strong price signals in 1995 and 1996, the area devoted to the major crops has shown a significant increase. For the 1996-98 period, world wheat area has averaged 4% above the 1991-95 period. Area devoted to the major oilseeds in 1998 is a 7% increase from two years earlier, with much of the increase due to higher soybean plantings in the U.S. and South America.
Coupled with increased area, world markets have also seen generally favorable yields since 1995. If current projections for 1998 prove accurate, world coarse grains will see a third successive year of above-average yields. In the past thirty years, we can only find one example, the 1984-87 period, when there were as many consecutive years above trend.
Price pressure due to increased supplies is not isolated to the crop markets. For livestock, the most notable example is pork. After seeing strong prices in 1996 and much of 1997, pork producers responded with increased herds and additional production. For 1998, production is expected to be 9% above a year ago. As a result, the annual average price is projected to be as much as 25% below the 1997 number.
Can Demand Keep Pace?
At the same time that production has increased, there are concerns about the strength of world demand. Most notably is the Asian financial crisis. Currency devaluations have reduced purchasing power in what had been one of the strongest growth regions. For total U.S. trade, the real trade-weighted exchange shows a 20% appreciation in the dollar since 1995.
Initially, the consensus was for a quick downturn and recovery. As the problems have persisted, most economists are becoming increasingly pessimistic about the scope and severity of the situation. For U.S. agriculture, these problems are translating into reduced exports into that region, with corn being one of the hardest hit. Compounding the problems for U.S. corn exports has been the presence of China as an increased exporter.
Putting Things In Perspective
Barring any major production problems, crop and livestock prices will average substantially lower in 1998 and 1999 than what was observed in the 1995-97 period. However, we must remember that prices in those years were much above historical levels. In addition, those prices brought increased area, which together with good yields, gave more production. These additional supplies have increased export competition and are the primary reason for the lower prices. A secondary reason is, of course, the Asian financial situation. It is also difficult to attribute much of the current price situation to specific provisions of the 1996 FAIR Act.
Summary
We should not forget that lower crop prices do provide benefits for the livestock sector in the way of lower feed costs. However, when we net out the positives and negatives and look at U.S. net farm income, the result will be certainly be negative when compared to recent times. For 1998 and 1999, FAPRI projects that net farm income will average $46 billion, a drop of 12% from the record level in 1996.
While the news sounds rather bleak and certain regions are under tremendous stress, the U.S. agricultural economy, as a whole, is still in much better shape than the early to mid 1980's. Income levels are well above those of the earlier period and debt-to-asset ratios have remained at relatively low levels.
In closing, Mr. Chairman, I would like to thank you for the opportunity to address the Committee and welcome any questions.
Summary of the U.S. Commodity Outlook
Wheat
Corn
Soybeans
Cotton
Beef
Pork
Dairy
Farm Income